Detecting summarization hot spots in meetings using group level involvement and turn-taking features
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this paper we investigate how participant involvement and turn-taking features relate to extractive summarization of meeting dialogues. In particular, we examine whether automatically derived measures of group level involvement, like participation equality and turn-taking freedom, can help detect where summarization relevant meeting segments will be. Results show that classification using turn-taking features performed better than the majority class baseline for data from both AMI and ICSI meeting corpora in identifying whether meeting segments contain extractive summary dialogue acts. The feature based approach also provided better recall than using manual ICSI involvement hot spot annotations. Turn-taking features were additionally found to be predictive of the amount of extractive summary content in a segment. In general, we find that summary content decreases with higher participation equality and overlap, while it increases with the number of very short utterances. Differences in results between the AMI and ICSI data sets suggest how group participatory structure can be used to understand what makes meetings easy or difficult to summarize.
منابع مشابه
Spotting "hot spots" in meetings: human judgments and prosodic cues
Recent interest in the automatic processing of meetings is motivated by a desire to summarize, browse, and retrieve important information from lengthy archives of spoken data. One of the most useful capabilities such a technology could provide is a way for users to locate “hot spots” or regions in which participants are highly involved in the discussion (e.g. heated arguments, points of excitem...
متن کاملSpotting “Hot Spots” i Human Judgments and P
Recent interest in the automatic processing of meetings is motivated by a desire to summarize, browse, and retrieve important information from lengthy archives of spoken data. One of the most useful capabilities such a technology could provide is a way for users to locate “hot spots” or regions in which participants are highly involved in the discussion (e.g. heated arguments, points of excitem...
متن کاملThe Relationship between Dialogue Acts and Hot Spots in Meetings
We examine the relationship between hot spots (annotated in terms of involvement) and dialogue acts (DAs, annotated in an independent effort) in roughly 32 hours of speech data from naturallyoccurring meetings. Results reveal that four independentlymotivated involvement categories (non-involved, disagreeing, amused, and other) show statistically significant associations with particular DAs. Fur...
متن کاملModelling Participant Affect in Meetings with Turn-Taking Features
This paper explores the relationship between turn-taking and meeting affect. To investigate this, we model post-meeting ratings of satisfaction, cohesion and leadership from participants of AMI corpus meetings using group and individual turn-taking features. The results indicate that participants gave higher satisfaction and cohesiveness ratings to meetings with greater group turn-taking freedo...
متن کاملIncorporating Speaker and Discourse Features into Speech Summarization
We have explored the usefulness of incorporating speech and discourse features in an automatic speech summarization system applied to meeting recordings from the ICSI Meetings corpus. By analyzing speaker activity, turn-taking and discourse cues, we hypothesize that such a system can outperform solely text-based methods inherited from the field of text summarization. The summarization methods a...
متن کامل